Bridging the Gap: Resolving Conflicts by Embracing Work Styles

Conflicts are inevitable in any setting. We each bring unique backgrounds, experiences, and personality traits to the table and these differences can often lead to misunderstandings. Interestingly, many conflicts in the workplace don’t stem from disagreements over tasks but rather from miscommunications rooted in varying work styles. Understanding these work styles is a powerful tool for resolving these miscommunications and fostering a collaborative environment. By recognizing and respecting individual differences, leaders and team members can avoid common pitfalls that lead to workplace discord and slow down progress. This knowledge serves as a foundation for developing empathy across teams.

The Role of Work Styles in Conflict

Work styles can be categorized into several types, such as task-oriented versus relationship-oriented, structured versus flexible, detail-focused versus big-picture-focused, and proactive versus reactive. These differences are not inherently problematic; in fact, they can bring a richness of perspective to a team. However, when these styles clash, they can lead to misunderstandings, frustration, and ultimately, conflict.

I once worked with a colleague, Joe, who would often say in frustration, “I wish everyone would just think like me.” In this case, his frustration stemmed from a lack of understanding of another colleague, Joan’s, perspective. They were using similar words, appeared to have similar ideas but the execution was not on the same page.

Joe’s approach was straightforward—he wanted everyone to get on board with his vision and move forward quickly. He believed that once everyone saw things from his perspective, the best path would be clear. On the other hand, Joan preferred to gather all the data, ensuring that every detail was considered before making a decision. She wanted to discuss what was needed, test for gaps in information, and ensure nothing was overlooked.

This mismatch created tension. Joe was ready to move forward, while Joan was still in the information-gathering phase. Although they were discussing the same project, they were in completely different mindsets.

Had they understood each other’s thinking processes, they could have avoided frustration. Joan could acknowledge Joe’s message, and Joe could give Joan the space to gather the necessary data. Instead, they were stuck in a cycle of misunderstanding, wishing the other person would just “think like me.”

Variety in thought processes creates a balanced team. It mitigates blind spots and encourages healthy conflict. This dynamic keeps things moving forward and prevents teams from getting caught in a never-ending loop of inaction.

Developing a deeper understanding of each team member’s thinking style and learning how to leverage these styles for the best results can create an unstoppable team dynamic. It empowers individuals to better articulate their needs while recognizing others’ perspectives. When conflicts arise, they can transform into healthy exchanges rather than battles over who is right. This insight equips teams to bridge differences before they escalate into significant issues.

Bringing the Concept of Thinking Styles into a Team Dynamic

I worked with one team that struggled to meet its goals on time. While they agreed on the overall objectives, they couldn’t seem to piece everything together to achieve them. We conducted a team-building exercise focused on reviewing each person’s decision-making and communication style. This process identified each person’s unique work style and the support needed for each approach.

The results were enlightening. This newfound understanding sparked something new in their team dynamics, energizing the group. They began to acknowledge each other’s styles, integrate different approaches into their thinking, and as a result, the team’s communication and collaboration reached new heights.

By fostering empathy and understanding, teams can achieve extraordinary results.

Enhancing Communication Between Introverts and Extroverts

Introversion and extroversion are prime examples of how differing work styles can lead to conflict. Introverts often prefer to think deeply before speaking, working alone or in small groups. Extroverts, by contrast, are energized by social interactions and may speak their thoughts as they arise. These differing communication styles can cause friction in team settings, especially when collaboration is required.

Paul, an extroverted team leader, was frustrated with Olivia, one of his direct reports, who was an introvert. Paul frequently asked for input during team meetings, expecting immediate feedback. Olivia, however, preferred to process information before responding, which Paul misinterpreted as disengagement. Their conflicting communication styles began to erode trust between them.

Recognizing the strain this was causing, their manager encouraged the entire team to complete work style personality assessments. The results revealed that Olivia’s introversion led her to prefer thoughtful, reflective responses, while Paul’s extroversion made him more comfortable with spontaneous, real-time discussions.

Once Paul understood that Olivia’s need for reflection wasn’t disengagement but simply her way of processing information, he knew to give her the space she needed. Similarly, Olivia understood that Paul’s eagerness for immediate feedback wasn’t pushy but a reflection of his collaborative nature.

By adjusting his approach—such as sending meeting agendas and information in advance—Paul allowed Olivia the time she needed to prepare thoughtful contributions. Olivia, in turn, became more comfortable engaging in discussions, knowing she had time to reflect beforehand. Through the lens of their work styles, both gained empathy for each other’s approaches, improving their communication and enhancing team collaboration.

Practical Steps for Using Work Styles to Resolve Conflict

These stories illustrate how identifying work styles can be a powerful tool for conflict resolution. Here are some practical steps to leverage these assessments for resolving workplace conflicts:

1. Encourage Self-Awareness: Personality assessments allow individuals to develop a deeper understanding of their work styles. This self-awareness is the first step in recognizing how one’s behaviors might be perceived by others.
2. Foster Empathy: When team members understand the work styles of their colleagues, they are more likely to approach conflicts with empathy. Personality assessments help teams move beyond surface-level assumptions and appreciate the different strengths each individual brings to the table.
3. Facilitate Open Communication: Use work style assessments as a starting point for conversations about communication preferences, decision-making processes, and potential friction points. This can help prevent misunderstandings before they escalate into conflicts.
4. Adapt Expectations and Processes: By identifying individual work styles, teams can adjust workflows and expectations to empower different approaches. This flexibility helps resolve conflicts and leads to a more collaborative work environment.
5. Focus on Team Dynamics: Assessments not only help individuals but also offer insights into overall team dynamics. Leaders can use this information to create balanced teams, ensuring a mix of complementary work styles that enhance collaboration.

Conflict in the workplace is often rooted in clashing work styles rather than fundamental differences in values or goals. An in-depth work style personality assessment can provide critical insights into these differences, offering a path to greater empathy, understanding, and ultimately, resolution. By using these assessments, teams can bridge communication gaps, resolve conflicts more effectively, and enhance their overall performance. Embracing these differences, rather than trying to eliminate them, can lead to stronger, more cohesive teams that are better equipped to handle challenges and achieve their shared goals.